When Christian Burgess, captain of Union Saint‑Gilloise lifted the trophy at the Super Cup 2024Stade Joseph Marien, Club Brugge fell 2‑1 on Sunday, July 20, 2024. The win marked Union’s second consecutive Super Cup triumph and extended their unbeaten streak against the Bruges‑based giants.
Why this match mattered
Historically, Club Brugge has been the heavyweight in Belgian football, boasting more league titles and a dominant head‑to‑head record against Union. In the last 16 meetings, Brugge logged eight wins, five draws and only three victories for the Brussels side. Yet Union entered the showdown on a 10‑game unbeaten run, with nine wins and seven clean sheets, turning the narrative on its head. The clash wasn’t just a curtain‑raiser for the new season; it was a litmus test for who would shape Belgian football’s power balance in the coming months.
Match timeline and key moments
The opening half was a roller‑coaster. Union pressed early, forcing a corner that produced the opening goal in the 12th minute. Simon Mignolet, Brugge’s veteran goalkeeper, dived instinctively but the ball slipped into the net. Club Brugge answered two minutes later, with Hans Vanaken threading a low drive past the Union defence. The dead‑lock was finally broken in the 68th minute when Christian Burgess rose high on a set‑piece to head home the winner.
Stat sheet – the numbers behind the drama
- Possession: Union 53% – Brugge 47%
- Shots on target: Union 6 – Brugge 5
- Corners: Union 7 – Brugge 4
- Pass accuracy: Union 84% – Brugge 81%
These stats underline how evenly matched the teams were, despite the pre‑match chatter that favoured Union on form.
Injuries and squad rotation
Club Brugge were missing several key players. Gustaf Nilsson sat out with a hamstring strain, while promising youngsters Kyriani Sabbe and Bjorn Meijer were sidelined due to separate knocks. The absences forced head‑coach Ronny Deila to reshuffle his midfield, slotting Hugo Vetlesen into a more advanced role. Union, on the other hand, benefited from the recent exit of veteran goalkeeper Anthony Moris, who departed earlier in the week, prompting Burgess to don the captain’s armband for the first time in a final.
Player reactions and coaching comments
After the final whistle, Burgess said, “It feels great to lift the trophy for the fans. We’ve worked hard all season, and today the whole team showed why we belong at the top.” Club Brugge’s captain, Simon Mignolet, admitted disappointment but remained optimistic: “We’ll learn from this. The squad is still young, and we have the quality to bounce back.” Coach Deila added, “Missing Nilsson and the others hurt, but the players showed resilience. We’ll regroup and aim for the league title.”
What the win means for Union Saint‑Gilloise
The victory cements Union’s claim as Belgium’s emerging powerhouse. Extending their unbeaten run to 12 games overall and nine at home, the Brussels club now boasts the longest active streak in the top flight. The triumph also strengthens their brand internationally, with scouts from the Dutch Eredivisie and French Ligue 1 already circling Union’s standout performers. Financially, the Super Cup prize money and associated sponsorship boosts are expected to fund the club’s planned youth academy expansion late next year.
Future outlook for both clubs
Union will look to carry momentum into the Jupiler Pro League, where they sit third after ten games. Their next big test comes against defending champions KRC Genk in early August – a match many pundits will label a “title decider”. For Club Brugge, the focus shifts to the league’s opening weeks and the Europa League group stage. With the injured trio expected back before September, Brugge’s squad depth should return to full strength, giving them a realistic shot at reclaiming domestic dominance.
Frequently Asked Questions
How does Union Saint‑Gilloise’s Super Cup win affect their league ambitions?
The win adds confidence and gives the squad a winning mentality early in the season. With a 12‑game unbeaten run, Union now sits third in the Jupiler Pro League and is poised to challenge traditional powerhouses for the title.
Which Club Brugge players missed the Super Cup and why?
Gustaf Nilsson was sidelined with a hamstring strain, while Kyriani Sabbe and Bjorn Meijer each suffered separate injuries (a minor ankle sprain and a thigh bruise). Their absences forced tactical adjustments for the final.
What were the key statistical advantages Union held?
Union enjoyed slightly higher possession (53% vs 47%), more shots on target (6 to 5), and a better pass accuracy (84% to 81%). They also earned three more corners, reflecting their attacking intent.
When is Club Brugge’s next major fixture?
Club Brugge open their league campaign on August 3 against KRC Genk and then head into the Europa League group stage later that month, where they will face teams from Spain, Turkey and Scotland.
Why is the venue, Stade Joseph Marien, significant?
Located in Brussels, Stade Joseph Marien is Union Saint‑Gilloise’s historic home ground. Hosting the Super Cup there gave the club a familiar backdrop and a vocal fan base that helped fuel the victory.
Sports
Wesley Nakamatsu
October 6, 2025 AT 01:42One cannot overlook the tactical discipline exhibited by Union Saint‑Gilloise; the side orchestrated a balanced possession game while maintaining structural integrity, a hallmark of European football that our own domestic clubs should aspire to emulate. Their measured approach, combined with effective set‑piece execution, demonstrates a level of strategic planning that transcends mere physicality.
Tyler Tucker
October 15, 2025 AT 07:55What a devastating blow for Brugge they were crushed in the most heartbreaking fashion!
Reid Vance
October 24, 2025 AT 14:08Looking at the match data, Union held a slight edge in possession at 53 % versus 47 % for Brugge, but the real story lies in their six shots on target compared to five from the visitors, highlighting a marginal yet decisive offensive efficiency. The seven corners earned by Union also indicate a proactive approach in the final third, while Brugge’s inability to convert their chances points to a possible lack of composure under pressure. Moreover, the passing accuracy figures-84 % for Union against 81 % for Brugge-suggest that the Brussels side possessed a cleaner distribution network, which likely contributed to their ability to control the tempo of the game.